CPI #14, California Power Lines

  • Which direction California’s 1996 electricity deregulation law was supposed to make consumers’ costs go: down.
  • Expected hike in residential electricity bills because of a temporary emergency rate increase approved by California’s Public Utilities Commission on January 4: 9%.1
  • Number of times that the State of California has imposed rolling blackouts this month because electricity demand exceeded supply: 2.2
  • After-tax profits since last May of California’s seven out-of-state power producers and marketers, which have hiked energy prices on the wholesale market: >$4.7 billion.3
  • Amount Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric, and other California utilities have received since deregulation from California ratepayers to pay off their “stranded assets”-debts acquired from bad investments, largely in nuclear power plants: $20 billion.4
  • Amount that Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric, the state’s two largest utilities say they are in the red, because they can’t afford the high cost of wholesale energy: $12 billion.
  • How much Southern California Edison and PG&E’s, parent and affiliated companies have spent on power plants, stock buybacks, and other purchases recently, despite complaints of near-bankruptcy: $22 billion.5
  • Amount of campaign contributions distributed by PG&E and Southern California Edison in California races during the 2000 elections: $3.5 million.6
  • Amount PG&E gave to Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg (D-Sherman Oaks): $49,000.
  • Amount that consumers would pay in surcharges to bail out the two utilities under a proposal by Hertzberg: up to $12 billion.7
  • Hertzberg's position on campaign finance initiative, proposition 34, on the 2000 California ballot, criticized as a sham by campaign finance reform groups: support.

_________________________________
1 California Public Utilities Commission, News Release, January 3, 2001, “California PUC Authorizes Surcharge,” Megawatt Daily, Jan