Clean Elections at work

Small Business Equals Big Impact

When trying to influence a lawmaker, there is no better tactic than good old fashioned face to face constituent contact.



Survey of Likely Candidates in Connecticuts First Clean Elections Cycle

The Connecticut State Elections Enforcement Commission published a survey on January 1, 2008 on "Projected Levels of Candi


Arizona Clean Elections Statistics

The Arizona Clean Elections Institute produced this fact sheet on Arizona Clean Elections statistics from 2002 through 2006.



Maine Clean Elections Statistics

Produced by Maine Common Cause, this factsheet presents Clean Elections statistics on the 2002 through 2006 Maine elections cycles.



Maine Ethics Commission Touts Clean Elections

“2007 Study Report: Has Public Funding Improved Maine Elections?” 2007 Report on the Maine Clean Election Act, Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices.



"White" Paper Makes Case for Fair Elections

This "white" paper makes the case to Congress for Fair Elections.



Seventy Percent of CT Candidates Say They Will Use Clean Elections

Keith E Hamm and Robert E Hogan, “Candidate Perceptions of Campaign Financing in State Legislative Eleciotns: Preliminary Observations,”



High Quality, Low Income Candidates More Likely to Run with Public Financing

 Raymond J  La Raja, “Candidate Emergence in State Legislative Elections: Does Public Funding Make a Difference?” University of Massachusetts, Amherst,



Major Survey to Probe Why Small Donors Give

Michael J Malbin et al, “The CFI Small Donor Project: An Overview of the Project and a Preliminary Report on State Legislative Candidates’ Perspe



Increased Electoral Competitiveness Predicted in Connecticut

Kenneth R Mayer, Timothy Werner, “Electoral Transitions in Connecticut: The Implementation of Clean Elections in 2008,” University of Wisconsin-Madison, Paper prepared for delivery at the 2007 Ann



Syndicate content